Europeans want to remain neutral in a potential US-China conflict and are reluctant to loosen ties with China, a new survey by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) think tank published on Wednesday (7 June) found.
French president Emmanuel Macron was recently criticised for hitting a more conciliatory tone in Beijing in April, and suggesting that Europeans should stay out of a military conflict between the US and China over Taiwan.
EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, however, later called for “de-risking” from China, fostering trade ties, but managing risks better.
Now, it seems, at least according to the poll conducted in 11 EU countries, most Europeans agree with Macron’s position, even if China has said its partnership with Russia has no limits.
On average, only about a quarter (23 percent) of Europeans would want their country to take America’s side, the poll found.
Europeans still see China predominantly as “a necessary partner,” even if 70 percent of respondents believe Russia and China are partners on the global stage.
At the same time, Russia is increasingly seen as an adversary or rival, a view held by some 64 percent of respondents, an increase from about a third of respondents when the same question was posed in a 2021 poll.
However, only 37 percent in Italy and 17 percent in Bulgaria think Russia is an adversary. A majority of respondents in Bulgaria (62 percent) and Hungary (59 percent) view Russia as an “ally” or “partner” of their country.
Many in Bulgaria (51 percent), Austria (36 percent), and Hungary (32 percent) would like their country to re-establish a fully cooperative relationship with Russia once the war is over.
Europeans’ perception of China has remained surprisingly unchanged when compared with the results of the poll conducted in 2021.
“They do not see China as a power that challenges and wants to undermine Europe, and they do not buy into the ‘democracy versus autocracy’ framework promoted by the Biden administration,” the report’s writers, Jana Puglierin and Pawel Zerka of ECFR, note.
Germany, Sweden, France, and Denmark are the only countries where the prevailing view is to see China as a “rival” or an “adversary”, rather than an “ally” or “partner”.
Only about a fifth (22 percent) of Europeans consider Europe’s trade and investment relationship with China as being more risky than beneficial.
However, 41 percent of respondents on average would be ready to sanction Beijing if it delivered weapons to Moscow, even if that meant seriously damaging Western economies. A minority of 33 percent, on average, would oppose this.
Respondents in Austria (45 percent), Hungary (44 percent), Italy (42 percent), Bulgaria (39 percent), and Germany (38 percent) were most likely to oppose such sanctions.
But European seem to know the risks too. Many Europeans oppose the idea of Chinese ownership of key infrastructure, such as bridges or ports (65 percent), tech companies (52 percent), or newspapers (58 percent) in Europe.
With regards to the US, it’s mostly seen as a necessary partner. But when asked what impact, if any, the re-election of Donald Trump would have on EU-US relations, a majority of respondents (56 percent) stated they would be “weaker”.
It is not surprising that Europeans want to rely more on themselves for defence. Almost three-quarters (74 percent) believe that Europe cannot always rely on the US for its security, while only 8 percent say the US will always protect Europe.
“This could be a defining moment for the EU, and poses the question of whether it can reconcile differences of opinion within the bloc, and shift from its dependence on the United States to a position where it can strike its own policy positions,” report co-author and senior fellow, Jana Puglierin, said.
Researchers suggest that leaders should communicate better the risks of Europe’s interdependence on China and argue that excessive dependence on Chinese investment “will inhibit the EU’s ability to speak out on human rights and democracy”.
“If European leaders were to base their actions on the expectations of the public, they would fail to prepare for highly disruptive scenarios — with potentially devastating consequences for European security,” the report’s co-author and ECFR senior fellow, Pawel Zerka said.
“They should therefore enter into an active conversation with their publics to prepare them for various geopolitical scenarios and difficult decisions, and communicate the dangers of inaction,” he added.